Step 1: Publish In High-Impact Journals In 90 Days. Guaranteed.

• 3 months of direct mentorship. Unlimited direct messaging access to our FastTrack Research Mentors (PhDs and Professors), with a typical 24-hour response time Monday through Friday.
• 1-on-1 roadmap session. An hour-long call at the start to clarify your topic and establish a step-by-step personalised plan for how to execute and write your research paper.
• 2x weekly group feedback calls. Live sessions (1 hour each) to receive direct feedback on your work, discuss challenges, and learn from fellow researchers.
• Step-by-step video courses and worksheets. The entire research and writing process broken down into manageable mini-assignments. You'll submit these worksheets for personalised feedback to ensure total confidence at every stage.
• Custom AI research instruments. Purpose-built tools we developed, connected to 250 million papers, that run our validation methods on your project: the Duplication Test, topic checks, journal profiling. They pressure-test your work at every stage. You stay the author.

Most people start there, and it's the best place to start, because the topic is where first papers are won or lost.

In your roadmap session we generate and validate topic ideas against your interests, your access to data and your hours, using the Convergence Method, and map out three or four viable research questions. You leave with a validated topic, and you learn the method, so you can do it yourself for every paper after.

Much more than a course. You get a roadmap session that turns where you are now into a step-by-step plan, unlimited direct messaging with Prof Stuckler and the mentor team, two live group feedback workshops a week, detailed video feedback on everything you submit, and a community for day-to-day help.

We guide you through execution; we don't hand you videos and wish you luck.

Submit your work at any stage: research questions, abstracts, literature reviews, draft sections. You get detailed video feedback, often screen-recorded with commentary, showing exactly what to change.

There's live feedback at the weekly workshops, and if your timetable means you miss them, you still submit and still get a personalised video response.

Yes, it's entirely possible. Many of our students, featured above, had minimal or no prior experience and still got published in about 3 months. You do not need a methods background. That is the part we teach.

That said, the speed at which you get your paper published will largely be contingent upon how much time you are able and willing to dedicate on a weekly basis. Most students who publish in 3 months spend about 5 to 10 hours per week on their paper. We provide the structure and accountability; your consistent effort determines the pace.

We won't put a date on acceptance, because that date isn't ours to set. What we can tell you is how the work is structured: you always know the next step, and revisions are a normal part of the process rather than a sign something went wrong. If a heavy stretch of term or work makes those hours impossible, we adapt the plan. Consistency matters more than intensity.

Yes, absolutely. The FastTrack program covers all facets of quantitative methods, from designing your study, through data collection and analysis. We provide support for R, Stata, and SPSS.

No. We work alongside your supervisor, not around them. Most members join because their supervisor is stretched thin, not absent.

Many find supervision meetings get more productive once they arrive with validated questions and structured drafts.

The videos teach the method. The mentorship applies it to your paper.

The difference is feedback on your actual work: your topic validated against the literature, your drafts marked up, your next step always clear. Watching someone else's paper get fixed is not the same as having yours fixed.

Yes. Your work stays between you and the mentor team, and your ideas remain yours. We agree any authorship openly at the roadmap session, and only if you want it and the contribution earns it.

Only if you want that, and only where the contribution meets authorship criteria. Some researchers invite a mentor onto the paper; others keep sole authorship.

The support is identical either way, and we agree it openly at the roadmap session rather than at the end.

Tell us early. That is what the feedback calls and the daily messaging are for.

Stalling is almost always a sign the plan needs adjusting rather than that you need to work harder, and adjusting it is quick once someone can see where you are stuck. And we don't stop at the end of the three months.

We're so confident in our system that if you follow the process, we'll stick with you until your paper is successfully published, at no extra cost. In other words, even after the initial 3-month program ends, we'll continue guiding you if you:

• Invest 5 to 10 hours per week on your research
• Attend the group calls
• Complete the assigned worksheets and revisions

We haven't seen another program match this level of commitment. Most stop after a set period. We guarantee we'll stay with you beyond 90 days (or however long it takes) as long as you're putting in the effort.

That commitment is safe to make because of what comes first. We validate your topic against the literature before you write a word, so you start from a question with a real gap behind it, and you never go down a dead end. You learn the validation method itself, so every paper after this one starts the same way.

Important note: we can't guarantee acceptance in a specific journal or by a certain date. Nobody can, and anyone who says otherwise is selling you something. What we do guarantee is that we won't stop after three months if you're still actively working. No small print about which journals count, and no time limit that ends your support.